Jump to content

  • Articles

    Our website articles
    Show all categories

    Machine embroidery converters: comparison

    By Irina, in Machine embroidery materials and technology, , 3 comments, 4,617 views
    Converters is a small but pleasant bonus from the embroidery software manufacturers. A converter is a small app that allows users to watch, scale and save machine embroidery files in a variety of formats. Besides the aforementioned functions, some of them have additional options.
    For example, they allow you start/finish the embroidery designs, remove the short stitches and change colors. Some apps even have a simple in-built stitch editor.
    Judging from the information on the official websites, all converters also include a stitch generator that is a part of their "older brothers" – machine embroidery editors. This feature enables the apps to recognize not only the machine embroidery files but also the native ones. That is, the converter is able to open an object file that was created in the embroidery editor by the same manufacturer. An inbuilt stitch generator will recount the stitches every time you make some changes.
    Not all converters are alike. I use converters a lot because I often work with the ready files. Sometimes it is more convenient to use more than one. Looking back at my article on how to choose machine embroidery software I decided to write a review for every converter that can be downloaded and/or tried for free.
    To make everything I said more clear, I suggest you consult these:
    Download the trial version of the Wilcom TrueSizer converter here. Register and use the Ambassador on the official website.  Register and download My Editor on the official website or  Download a free trial version of MelcoSizer. Download TESViewer for free on the official website or  Register and download an old Coats EDV converter, My Editor analog with fewer possibilities. The last two are based on WingsXP.  In the table below you can see the parameters I used to compare converters. 

    The conclusion offers itself when you look at the software capabilities. No explanation needed. A lesser known free MyEditor converter outshines all the others. Bravo. However, MelcoSizer comes a close second. 

    Embroidering a postcard

    By Irina, in Machine embroidery materials and technology, , 0 comments, 3,552 views
    Original text by Marina Belova 
    I decided to embroider a postcard. I somehow don't have the mood for a Christmas postcard — perhaps, the reason is that I haven't found a proper design. But I stumbled upon a design for a Valentine's Day postcard instead. Here's a step-by-step report of me making it. 
    This is how the drawing looked like after some manipulations over the size (the original image came from an open source): 

    I settled upon 20.5x20.5 cm. 
    Here is the design preview: 

    It has altogether 7 colors: 6 for the hearts and the 7th for the stitch along the perimeter: I need this stitch because I'll trim to it. 
    I set a low density: 0.7–0.9 mm. I also removed the underlay. All connector stitches between the segments and the outlines were hidden on the edges of the objects and were made with running stitches. The stitch length was no less than 3 mm. I drew the tie-offs manually on hearts and inserted them automatically on letters. You can see the result in the photo below. 
    Naturally, I embroidered on paper. Read here on how to make a design for the embroidery on paper. 
    I chose the handmade paper, not a heavyweight variety but with long fibers that can be seen with the naked eye. 

    I chose the threads of the same thickness (#40) but of different structure: rayon, polyester, metallic. 
    The first thing I did was to frame a cut-away stabilizer. 

    Then I sprinkled it with temporary spray adhesive and stuck the paper to it: 

    I must point out that this adhesive is bad for securing the paper on the paper. They unstuck practically right away. I thought of that in advance, therefore, the first thing in my embroidery sequence was an outline that stitched the base of my postcard to the interfacing material.
    Having embroidered the squares, I trimmed the extra paper along the perimeter using scissors: 

    Now I could embroider safely – nothing would shift. 
    The design was embroidered rather quickly – hardly surprising as it only had 6105 stitches. The embroidery went well, the thread laid smooth, the paper didn't become perforated. 
    This is the embroidery still in the hoop but (almost) without the connector stitches: 

    After that I unhooped my semi-finished product and trimmed it along the outline: 

    This is how the wrong side looks like: 

    One should notice the tie-offs. If I wasn't lazy and drew them manually everywhere and not only on the hearts, the wrong side of my embroidery would be clean and I wouldn't need to cover it. But I decided to automatically insert tie-offs; the only thing I did was to increase the stitch length compared to the default one in my editor. 
    In the photo above you can see the ugly knots almost everywhere in the letters, and these are not easy to get rid of. 
    So the ready postcard looks like this: 

    The only thing left is to glue some interesting-looking paper to the inside, write something and give as a present. 

    Napkins embroidered in-the-hoop

    By Irina, in Machine embroidery materials and technology, , 0 comments, 6,115 views
    Original text by Yelena Kraftwork 
    The history of napkins goes back for centuries. People used them to clean their hands in the times when forks and spoons hadn't yet been invented. Napkins come in various shapes and sizes: rectangular, square, even round. Even the simplest napkin may become a nice decoration for your dinner table if you machine embroider it. This master-class will tell you how to embroider 4 napkins in one go. 

    Embroidery on napkins Materials: 
    Tearaway adhesive stabilizer  Embroidery threads  Machine embroidery design  Embroidery or sewing and embroidery machine  200*200 mm frame (or larger)  Four 300*300 mm napkins or pieces of fabric 
    In this masterclass, I used a custom design from Brother Innov-is 1E sewing and embroidery machine's memory. You are welcome to choose any of embroidery designs from our shop. 
    Embroidery on napkins The making process: 
    Cut a piece of stabilizer slightly bigger than your hoop. On the adhesive side draw the central lines with a fabric marker. Put your napkins onto the stabilizer in accordance with the lines. 


    Provided that you have a frame over 200*200 size, you can embroider all 4 of them in one go. 
    Place the napkins onto the stabilizer and press them together with an iron. The temperature depends on your type of fabric. Hoop the stabilizer together with the napkins so that the center lines register perfectly. 



    Choose your design and place it at the angle of 45° on all napkins. 


    Embroider the designs. Finish the borders with rolled hems on your overlocker or in some other way. Now you have a set of embroidered napkins that can make your friends envy when you invite them for tea. 
     



    In-The-Hoop. A doorknob hanger

    By Irina, in Machine embroidery materials and technology, , 0 comments, 3,028 views
    Original text by Marina Belova 
    To be honest, I don't like to sew, despite the fact that I'm fairly tightly bound to the sewing industry. Therefore, I've long set my eyes on creating a freestanding double-sided appliqué where you don't have to sew anything and a ready item comes right off your machine. What's more, this item is embroidered on both sides. Last year I tried to create New Year trees using this technique but something went wrong. Now I'm ready to try again. 
    This is the doorknob hanger I got as the result (the inscriptions say, accordingly, "Occupied" and "Vacant" — translator's note):
    Side 1: 

    Side 2: 

    For avoidance of doubt, the two sides view of the embroidered design: 

    Let me tell you about the making process. 
    I started, of course, with choosing a design. I found these free smile-shaped oranges on the Web, added some letters and drew my doorknob hanger: Here is what I got: 

    I created 2 embroidery sequences: First was the design itself. 

    And second was the edge finishing (same as in the traditional appliqué): 

    Now let's embroider. 
    I hoop the basic fabric for my hanger with the stabilizer. I commonly use a cheap Chinese cut-away middleweight one — it works well. 

    Embroider the main part of the design: 

    Unhoop the whole thing (carefully!) and trim very close to the stitch that shows us the edges. 

    Proceed to the second part of the embroidery. Hoop only the cut-away stabilizer. 

    Put the pieces of fabric with their wrong sides facing each other and fix them with a temporary spray adhesive or an ordinary paper glue (we won't embroider them anymore, only finish their edges, so you can use the glue if you like). 

    After that, I changed my standard bobbin thread for the upper thread specially winded on a bobbin. After all, my item has two faces, so it won't look good if one side of a thick satin column is embroidered with an ordinary white thread: 

    I load the second part of my design to the machine and embroider the outline: 

    Sprinkle the hooped stabilizer with the temporary spray adhesive and stick my semi-finished product onto it by either side so that it fit the hoop: 

    Now I do an E-stitch that stitches my item to the stabilizer perimeter-wise: 

    At this stage, you still have a possibility of adjusting the hoop if the stitch shifts. Because if it does, it is highly probable that the finishing border won't cover enough fabric, which will result in it falling off the item. For this reason, you need to carefully check everything and, in necessary, adjust the hoop. 
    I embroidered the finishing border: 

    Having embroidered the finishing border, I checked whether the fabric didn't fray and found that it did in a couple of places, in spite of all the hoop shifting. I've arrived at the conclusion that I was too skimp – the border would do better if it was a couple of mm wider (mine was only 4 mm).
    Then indeed nothing will fray and the border won't detach from the fabric. Also, the black outline that I stitched for the purpose of trimming, is exposed. It had better be covered. 
    So I created an additional embroidery sequence with a wider border and embroidered it right on top of the already existing ones. Just how much wider it was, you can see in the photo below: 


    This is my hanger still in the hoop, front side: 

    This is the wrong side: 

    After that, I unhooped the item, thoroughly tore off the stabilizer, cut the ends of the tie-offs, and singed the leftover fibers sticking out of the satin edges with a lighter. And get this hanger as a result: 


    All my efforts resulted in the following conclusions: 
    Such an item is quite easy to make. The finishing border should not be less than 6 mm.  The letters didn't come out good enough but if I ever going to make a hanger in the future, I'll correct my mistakes.  Gradients painted along a straight line look very crude on round objects. I should master the technique of painting gradient along a curve. Or, I should have blended all 3 colors instead of 2. But this is another topic. 

    Quilt on the embroidery machine. For the lazy ones )

    By Irina, in Machine embroidery materials and technology, , 0 comments, 2,537 views
    Original text by Marina Belova 
    An embroidery machine can do many interesting things besides the common embroidery. Not by itself, of course, but with the help of a person sitting at it. Nowadays there are many projects called Piece in the hoop. If asked to explain what it means, I would answer in that way: these are projects that allow getting a ready item or a semi-finished product without the use of the sewing machine. 
    What you can do in such a way: 
    Almost ready soft toys: you'll only have to stuff them and sew up the opening.  Eyelets of different shapes with double-sided appliqué for towels.  Various embroidered accessories that are sewn up right on the embroidery machine – smartphone cases, eyeglass cases and so on.  Semi-finished quilts. Both with the embroidery or not.  Could be many other things, for all I know. 
    All of them, of course, are made in a proper sequence tailored to their individual purposes. You can easily find all the instructions on the Web.
    The designs are necessarily digitized in a proper technique. 
    I've long observed how the quilt on an embroidery machine is made. Today I, at last, decided to create a square with a very simple design myself.
    In my opinion, quilt can be regarded as a type of appliqué, so why not to make it in the hoop? Especially if you dislike sewing as much as I do. 
    Here's what I got as the result: 

    a quilt square made on the embroidery machine
    Below is the step-by-step guide. 
    First, I created a simple design containing the running stitches only. About 1020 stitches in general. 

    Design preview from the quilt editor 
    I selected 5 different kinds of fabric and went with them to the machine. 
    The first thing I did was to hoop a stabilizer. Not long ago I bought a 60 g/m Chinese perforated tear-away stabilizer. It is very soft, despite being rather dense. I decided to use it. 
    Quilt: step 01 
    The first thing I embroidered was an outline for my future quilt. I settled upon the black threads – so that everything would be visible. 

    Quilt: step 02
    Then I placed the basic fabric so that it completely covered the embroidered square. 

    Quilt: step 03
    After that I stitched my fabric along the perimeter so that it didn't shift, crease or fold. Perhaps I shouldn't have done it, I don't know. But I thought it would be right. 

    Quilt: step 04 
    Then I embroidered the upper ornately shaped border and also the first outline to which I'd fit my first piece of fabric. 

    Quilt: step 05 
    I picked up the fabric and placed it face down with its edge to the stitch: 

    Quilt: step 06 
    I started the machine and stitched this piece of fabric to the one that was already there: 

    Quilt: step 07 
    Now it was an interesting moment – I folded the fabric into the face: 

    Quilt: step 08 
    Then I embroidered one more stitch on top of everything, to which I would trim the extra blue fabric and with which I would align the next piece: 

    Quilt: step 09 
    I trimmed all the extra material: 

    Quilt: step 10 
    Put the next piece of fabric: 

    Quilt: step 11 
    Again and again, I stitched, folded, trimmed and added new pieces of fabric – until the embroidery was completed. 

    Quilt: steps 12-25 
    In the end, when everything had been stitched and folded, I decided to add one more black stitch along the perimeter of my square. Now I think it was unnecessary. The stabilizer is wrong, too – it shows through the fabric. I should have used a different one. Something like spunbond, I think, which wouldn't be visible through the fabric. You need to test every time, you know. 

    This technique requires quite a lot of effort. But me having tried it suggested the following: I could add ornaments to the jointing edges to get something akin to crazy quilt. Must look interesting. Also, there are tons of patterns for this purpose on the internet. 

    Cutwork with a pair of scissors

    By Irina, in Machine embroidery materials and technology, , 6 comments, 8,077 views
    Original text by Marina Belova 
    I'm giving a serious thought to creating cutwork on the embroidery machine. Once and for all I decided to work out the technique to the last detail and to learn all the secrets of cutting out the holes by hand. 
    I've encountered this embroidery technique many times before. Even drew the designs for it in Corel Draw. Though I'm not an artist. Like the majority of designers that create their own embroidery designs, I've never thought how to make a drawing of such quality that it could be embroidered right away. To take into account all the slight and subtle differences (what should be done and what shouldn't), one must understand both the digitizing and the embroidery processes. Well... that's why the embroiderers offered some criticism of my designs. After all, the resulting look of the embroidery depends on the original idea a great deal. 
    In my grandmother's coffers, I found a cutwork curtain, make in a free-motion embroidery technique. This machine made piece was created 40 or 50 years ago. 

    The curtain has been washed and washed again many times but the embroidery is still there: nothing has frayed, nothing has worn away! I also want to point out that the embroidery on this particular piece is very delicate. Which cannot be said about machine embroidery designs created on a computer. Here's a typical design from one of the most popular Russian embroidery shops, Advanced Embroidery Designs. (Nota bene: you can also find a variety of such designs in our shop). 
    Thin borders are not perhaps the best-looking but their main advantage is that nothing will fray or detach. Such items are not excessively thick, the embroidery is very soft and looks more delicate. 
    Having seen all this once again, I decided to create my own design and achieve as thin bridges as possible. 
    So I found 2 designs. A flapper for sachet: 

    A rosette-shaped drink coaster: 

    I digitized the first design, for the sachet with a flapper: 

    After two unsatisfactory attempts and further corrections, I arrived at the conclusion that the density should be reduced to at least 0.7-0.8 mm and the number of running stitches under the bridges narrowed down to just 2. The bridges themselves should be made with two narrow zigzags running in the opposite directions. 
    A special focus should be on the first part of the design which contains the first parallel underlay with very short stitches and small zigzag stitches over it. This is the basis for the embroidery. The stitches should interlink so that the bridges won't detach and the satin borders around the holes won't fall off. You need to plan your embroidery sequence so as to keep the number of trims to a minimum. 
    An even greater attention should be paid to the choice of fabric. My first fabric was so battered with old age that it raveled out in my hands when I started to fiddle with it after the embroidery: 

    In the end, I embroidered this design on a linen piece and then sewn the sachet. I showed the photo in my article about cutwork creation: 

    I'll elaborate upon my second design because it turned out so much better than the first. Below is the preview of the ready design: 

    I planned to embroider it not with a rayon or a polyester thread, but with a cotton one (~30–35 g). In my opinion, lustrous embroidery threads are not suitable for cutwork because they make it look like a cheap Chinese product. 
    First, I hooped a heat-away stabilizer called Thermogaze from Gunold together with a piece of linen fabric. 

    Hit the start button and stitched a double outline along the perimeter of the design: 

    Right after that I added a small zigzag on top of it: 

    I took the hoop off the machine – time to cut out the holes. Cutting out took as much time as the embroidery and didn't please me the slightest bit.
    One hell of a task, not for the weak-nerved! In spite of all effort, I cut the stabilizer in several places: 

    Then I inserted the hoop back into the machine and embroidered the rest in one go: 

    This is the wrong side. It is rather neat. 

    Then I trimmed the rosette along the perimeter. 

    I now have little left to do – to remove the stabilizer. I put my rosette between two layers of paper: 

    And then place a very hot iron (no steam!) on top of it: 

    Wait for about 2 Tequilajazzz songs until Thermogaze will get darker. This is what I got on the wrong side:
     
    Rumple and pull the embroidery to remove the stabilizer. Also, this will help you to test the embroidery for endurance and resistance to wear.
     
    Here is the ready rosette: 

    It has the most ordinary look, and the bridges are not as thin as I wanted. But neither are they the thick monsters from the other designs. I believe that if embroidered with the ordinary #40 threads the bridges would be much thinner. A very pleasant fact is that nothing shifts or comes apart. 
    Why did I choose Thermogaze as a stabilizer instead of a water soluble film? Because it's much easy to use; the film would be very hard to wash away afterward. The only thing I like about embroidery on film – it is practically impossible to snip it with scissors when cutting out holes, which cannot be said about a heat-away stabilizer. 
    My entire design had only 2 trims: the first one for cutting out holes and the second one for trimming after completion. This was not easy to achieve. Also, I had to rack my brains over joining the parts of the embroidery with the underlay so that it would keep it together after the embroidery. My only mistake was not enough reinforcement of the edges. Satin border, in my opinion, insufficient. You need more reinforcement along the perimeter, like in a festoon. I'll do that next time. 
    Now I understand that the experienced pros of free-motion embroidery would make the best digitizers. They, too, try their best to avoid trims and plan the embroidery sequence right in the course of the embroidery. 
    In general, I learned that there is no sacral knowledge behind this type of the design. A cutwork design can be created in any embroidery editor.
    All the digitizing laws are just as relevant here. The only thing you need is to use your brains. 
    Download the ready design here. 

    Embroidering an origami-style box for small things

    By Irina, in Machine embroidery materials and technology, , 0 comments, 3,292 views
    Original text by Marina Belova 
    I think that many people are familiar with origami — everybody I know had made paper fliers, pompoms, tulips, etc., in their childhood. Today I suggest to refresh our memory about this art and make the simplest possible box called "masu". 

    Of course, the biggest attraction of this project for me is that I won't have to sew. I'll just embroider the fabric and make a three-dimensional figure out of it. 
    So. I plan to embroider only 4 sides of the box. I drew this simple design and fitted it into a square: 

    It is very easy to calculate the measurements of a square piece of fabric and the position of the embroidery on it using this formula: 
    L=1.41х (S+2xH) 
    Where L is a square side length  S is bottom length  H is the box height  Why the diagonal position of the embroidery? Because I folded the paper to create a box, marked the sides where I wanted my embroidery and unfolded it back again. Then I did a drawing in Corel, based on the proportions I calculated using a formula above. 
    I digitized my drawing: 

    Hooped the fabric together with the stabilizer: 

    And embroidered the entire design: 

    Two red stitches on the right and on the left of the ornament are parts of the borderline of my future square visible in the frame. Tacks mark the centers of the sides of my square. According to them I'll draw the required square and cut it out. I didn't tear away the stabilizer from the wrong side. It is necessary for making the fabric coarse. 
    I extended the embroidered lines so that they formed a square: 

    Cut the square out: 

    Now it's time to make a box. I turn the fabric the wrong side up and fold it in two and then again to get proper creases. They will help me to make the box. 

    This way: 

    Then open the square up and fold the corners into the center: 

    You'll get an envelope: 

    After that I fold every edge into the center of the square and unfold them back again to make the sides of the box: 

    Like this: 

    Now it's time to assemble the box: For this, I need to unfold two corners diagonally: 

    And then form the sides by folding vertically along the creases: 

    This way: 

    Now I fold the fabric in along the creases and also fold the corners into the center of the bottom the box: 


    This is all, in a nutshell. The box is ready. It is harder to fold the fabric than paper but not impossible. Especially if you harden the fabric so as to make it coarse. 

    I put a piece of ordinary cardboard on the bottom of the box to cover the edges of the fabric. But, in my opinion, it is possible to turn this into an advantage, too. Fox example, to embroider on the heavyweight fabric and harden it with the interfacing material and then finish the edges to prevent fraying. 

    How to make puffs on your embroidery machine

    By Irina, in Machine embroidery materials and technology, , 1 comment, 4,034 views
    Original text by Olga Milovanova

    The word "puff" derives from the French verb "bouffer" – to puff up. Puffs are rows of pleats arranged in a certain way.

    The fabric for them is gathered manually.
    The puffs were especially popular in the 70s and 80s: so-called "waffles", a type of handmade puffs, were used then for dresses and blouses.

    Nowadays we witness the second wave of popularity. Modern designers use this type of decoration in their collections. Puffs are becoming a fashionable detail of the clothes.


    Thanks to the innovations, it became possible to make puffs and create embroidery designs with crashing on the embroidery machines. 
    Brother Innov-is XV embroidery machine has an unusual library of designs with 3–5 mm stitches, which are repeated 3–5 times. 
    These are crashing designs that imitate puffs. (Crashing effect is also called crinkle effect). 



    Madeira Smoking thread is used for that. After washing and ironing the threads on the wrong side gather and create wrinkles on the fabric. 

    These are what we can call «designs with crashing effect». 

    Let's play around! 
    Wind the Smocking thread on a spool, hoop the fabric, pick a crashing design from the library and start embroidering it. You won't need a stabilizer here. 
    After unhooping, the embroidery looks just like usual. Iron it. Set your iron at the maximum temperature for your fabric type and gently slide across its wrong side. No pressing down! The thread will gather about 30%. 

    The lighter is the fabric, the more pronounced will be the crashing effect. 
    I used a ready shirt as a test sample. 

    I aligned my future embroidery with the waistline. Framed the shirt, without a stabilizer, and embroidered it. 

    Set an iron at "Cotton" and "heated" the embroidery through, from the wrong side. This resulted in a "crashing" effect. 


    I decided that I wanted more volume and made changes to the sewing pattern. 
    I cut the pattern for the back bodice along the princess line and the waistline. On the lower side of the back bodice, starting from the folding line, 5–10 cm were left for allowance. No allowance in the upper part; I cut it from the folding line. 

    Gathered the fabric with the basting stitch along the waistline, and pinned the lower and upper sides face-to-face. Stitched the upper and the lower parts of the back bodice. 

    Time to embroider! Frame the fabric so that the seam line runs parallel to the edge of the frame. Position the design in such a way that the design will cover the seam joining the two details. 


    Stitch several times to make it more expressive. 

    Unhoop the whole thing, iron it with a hot iron from the wrong side. The smocking thread will shrink 30%, gathering the fabric, and the allowance will add the volume. 

    Now sew up the item. 

    This is the ready item embroidered on the back. 

    The experimenting continues )

    Loosely woven fabrics

    By Irina, in Machine embroidery materials and technology, , 0 comments, 5,333 views
    Original text by Marina Belova 
    Several days ago I was thinking if there was a difference between machine embroidery on a net and on a loosely-woven fabric. Technically, both of these materials have enough of empty space for the design to have rather an unappealing look, because the stitches don't have much to hold on to. And the most important task is to achieve even borders instead of jagged ones. 
    When you come to think of it, you can embroider on anything at all and still get good results. You just need some effort. That is, choose the right stitch parameters and meet all technical requirements. 
    The technical requirements in our case are simple and widely covered in the variety of sources: 
    Stabilizer under + stabilizer on top. Obviously, these fabrics being semitransparent, an ordinary tear-away or cut-away stabilizer isn't suitable for them. That being so, there are not many options left – either semitransparent spunbond (no-show mesh) or water-soluble stabilizers (among them even the adhesive ones with a protective layer, such as Filmoplast) or, as I have already mentioned in my article about embroidery on knitwear, a piece of organza of a matching color. You need to additionally secure this "sandwich" with a thin water soluble film on top and hoop it to prevent wrinkles.  You can use the threads of any thickness and structure.  Loosen the upper thread tension.  Use the most ordinary needles matching the threads and the fabric in thickness. Needlepoint – sharp.  Lower the speed a little so that not to pull the loosely woven yarns.  In my opinion, following these rules allows us to embroider almost any kind of design except the ones with a large number of stitches. The fabric is a very flexible thing, and it is better not to play with it. 
    There are some special aspects of the machine embroidery on this kind of fabric: 
    It goes without saying that you should pay close attention to the basis of the embroidery – the underlay. Debora Jones, for instance, advises applying 2 layers of underlay, consisting of the edge run and zigzags for satins and the lattice at 90° under the finishing fills. But if you want my opinion, I wouldn't be so keen on strengthening the fabric under the thin satin outlines – better to leave just one underlay of the two.  Use a standard stitch density. Don't increase or reduce it.  It makes good sense to increase the pull compensation a bit. For example, I set pull compensation at minimum 0.5 mm on each side of this mosquito, plus the artificial shape distortion (the outlines widening) mentioned here.  No extra-long stitches on these fabrics; the length should be limited to 3-4.5 mm. Anything longer than that should be split. 
    Nevertheless, the amount of overlapping of the object and its outline (shape distortion + compensation) just barely avoided the appearance of gaps.  Based on this experience, I would exclude the running stitch outlines from the design and use only simplest fonts like Arial.  Also, the most important thing is to test everything.  I used organza as a stabilizer for my mosquito because a tear-away one would be visible through my fabric (it is like cross-stitch canvas, but not quite). On the right you can see the fabric with the stabilizer under it and on the left – without it: 

    While in this photo there is organza on the right, and you cannot really tell which is which: 

    I hooped the fabric together with the organza: 

    And put a piece of water-soluble film on top: 

    The ready embroidery: 

    After that, I removed the film from the front and trimmed the organza along the perimeter. 

    I am quite satisfied with the result, though it has been my first attempt at embroidery on this fabric and that I chose a design with borders and very thin outlines. 

    One more method of color blending

    By Irina, in Machine embroidery materials and technology, , 1 comment, 2,778 views
    Original text by Marina Belova 
    I've written on the subject of color blending in machine embroidery several times, covering the basic blending principles and also 2 methods of doing it. Today I'll add one more method to the aforementioned two. 
    You can see the examples of this technique in the works of at least 2 famous embroidery persons: Bonnie Nielsen of Madeira and Niamh and her team embroidery. I like the ingenuity and the expressiveness of this color blending style, its devil-may-carishness, and chaotic nature. 
    Its key point is to superimpose low-density layers of fill stitches (either flat or motif ones). The density, stitch direction, and texture of each layer may vary. And the most important thing – the design is not filled completely as it is custom in standard digitizing (from one outline to the other), but instead, the layers are put on top of each other in blots of a different shape. The next layer may or may not be of a different color or shade, they may all be of the same color, it's the density that creates the color depth. 
    I.e. you should get something like in the case: 

    In this case, not only the fabric but also its texture and color play an important role. All this is visible between the stitches and makes embroidery especially beautiful. I also like that registering of the outlines is not important here – it is a different digitizing style. 
    Of course, it is not applicable to any kind of embroidery, but for the works in a modern style, it is rather good. This style bewitches me. And I understand that I cannot use just like that, but at the first sight, it looks easy enough. 

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...